Madhav
It was somehow a very unexpected news when I
heard recently of Madhav passing on, though why it should have been so, I don’t
know, he was nearly seventy five when he did pass on. One expected anyone
almost to pass on but him, somehow. Somehow one did not associate Madhav with
age – he was always so young in spirit, and yet, wise in unexpected ways,
unconventional ways, beyond his years, his era. He belonged not so much to his
day or past as much to the future in a way very few do, and that was only one
of his unusual qualities.
Where does one even begin remembering him? He
would joke about such an idea, and insist one forgets about it, firmly. Just as
he was very firm about not being photographed and about a few other such
things. But this is not a eulogy for his needs – he would not care if people
remembered or what they thought, he never had! This remembrance is for solace
of those of us that knew him and remember. One does wish he would know how and
how much one remembers and is grateful for all that one benefited from, and
that it would somehow please him, but one doubts it. He did not charge the
price of expressed gratitude either, for all he did for so many, in such a
variety of different ways, small or very, very major, life transforming quite
frequently, life enhancing almost always, life saving even, often enough, I suspect.
Hardest of all is to recreate the very person
one remembers so well, after years and decades, not because the memory is
dimmed but because his uniqueness of persona and style won’t quite come through
or be conveyed by someone, anyone, other than him. That probably would be so
even if he had children, for such a person in all his greatness is not
inherited by mere ordinary human reproduction. He leaves a mark on everyone he
ever met, in the smile they are lit up with at the very mention of him, at his
memory. His choice, his preference, his lifestyle.
But one fact is certain, and that is, he had
as much hand in my formation as anyone else, and that is saying it at minimum.
If he were not there at that time, I would have – could have – no longer existed
in all likelihood. This is as true in the barest physical sense as it is far
more so in many other ways, for he was the sole moral and psychological
support, not to forget the only one to encourage me to go ahead in doing what I
wanted to do – study, – and this against all conventional practices and
practical solutions that existed then or were offered for a young aspiring
person to live.
Time and again I was cautious, willing to give
in to prudence and general wisdom of the era, to find a safe anchor in a job
and an apartment and so on; he went to the dreams hidden somewhere in the
deepest corners of my being and said, go ahead, do that, precisely. Because he
believed in this going ahead, a life of mind, and had hankered and pushed for
just such a life for himself all his life. And so I found the courage to jump
off a cliff and soar for the time until the next time, time and again.
Many men do wish for and some do achieve this
– a life of mind – for themselves, and for a few of those of whom they are
mentors, but more or less these are all male cliques. Few encourage women,
young women, to this path, as freely and without reserve as they do other
males. Extremely few, male or female of the species named human, encourage
young women on this path so against all social pressure. It is generally
considered as suicidal to the male species as encouraging labour to form
cooperative industry would be for generic industry masters.
Madhav had no such worries, no such thoughts
to hold him back, and in fact was one of the few men who have not only a
sympathy and understanding of the problems a woman faces in a conventional life
(everyone has a mother, after all, and most have reasons to therefore have such
understanding if they have a mother who aspired to a life of mind and if they
did not disassociate themselves from her, if they had any sympathy and
comprehension) – but brought that sympathy and understanding down into
conversion to helping women (as well as men, which lot more people do but not
as well and as undemandingly as he did) in every way possible.
And in helping me, he showed a rare courage
that few – other than I – could comprehend, even, fully. Much less match it.
This courage is the hallmark of a man to me, man in general and him in
particular. Not every male visible in human form deserves the name of man and
quite a few women do, at that, if courage be the defining factor of man.
If I had not met him I would probably never
have been reassured about existence of men on this earth - I was at a stage and
an age when a diappointment and disillusion easily could take over for ever -
and would have been certain of finding no way out for life. But it was more
than luck and more than fortunate that he was there right at the time at the
right place, and more than willing and able to not only to guide, encourage,
and help, but also care. Most people would have found it easier to blame a
deperate victim and side with a dangerous bully whom one could not afford to
alienate, and they did, sooner or later. Madhav was alone different.
I have always thought of it as the very Divine
giving me a very concrete proof of Providence, by sending this agent to be
there for me, to care and protect and guide and encourage and everything else.
If caring and compassion be the hallmark of those who are qualified to be
called women or mothers or parents, he was qualified – well and well over
qualified, in fact.
And yet he was truly a person with no ties, or
as little as he could make them. His chosen responsibilities he did not shirk,
towards his mother and siblings, but attachments he did not want. This, very
deep in psyche, together with his very joyous style of being and congregating
with friends – and he had hundreds, probably more, more than anyone I have
known or even heard remotely of – and then also including women in the
perceived humanity to make friends with (rather than keeping them as targets of
other requirements but not equal really, as most other males do) had people
rather perplexed, particularly if they were normal conventional people. He
couldn’t care less, and so he saved at least one life – not merely from death
but from a victimisation of a life that would be pretty close to worst one
could think of, psychologically, and perhaps even more.
All this is giving no clue to the person as
most people would remember him, a small frame man with a style he adapted (from
the British he loved and admired) of a gentleman, casually debonair and
friendly with those he knew, always a helping had to offer to those in need to
the extent he could and that was usually considerably more than those far
wealthier did, (for he kept only what was needed for himself at bare minimum,)
and more than anything his ability to produce a laughter from anything or
nothing, with a joke – and an insight that would startle most people into
laughter from the shock of seeing something so different they couldn’t see in
the situation.
Not for him the morbid love of sorrow and
tragedy that mars many of higher intellect, nor the other traps of the vital -
he was once quite suddenly and unusually livid in expressing his disapproval
after seeing a then sensational blockbuster film depicting a young teenager
pair as romantic sex symbols – the maker of this film ought to be shot dead, he
said, and it was a Rudra bhaav that could not be countered or argued about! He
would have talked that young pair out of the folly until they grew up to
maturity and encouraged them meanwhile to go ahead and learn more and achieve
all they could. Enjoy life yes, but on the high road, avoid the common
pitfalls. Choose your own bank balance when it comes to choosing between your
money and him, he once told a bride-to-be, with a startled mother (who had
brought the girl to him for advice before the wedding) totally struck dumb
listening.
That is Madhav in my memory. Always a cheer
for those that could, a joke and a laugh to spread cheer. Laurel and Hardy were
his favourites, as were various other films that showed a positive role model.
Joy and laughter are the Divine gifts to the world, and he not only had them in
plenty but was ever the dispenser of both, like it or not. And some people do
think of every possible excuse to not like someone who can be so full of joy at
one end of the spectrum and equanimity on the other, giving no scope to the
killjoys of this world to intrude with a shadow in his sunshine. He received it
and he spread it.
If all this sounds close to a yogic
personality of some achievement it is probably because he was so without any
conscious attempt in that direction in this life, in fact he would have
ridiculed it and brushed it aside if anyone would have put it this way to him.
He ridiculed, of course, any suggestion that money mattered less than
relationships or friends or any such commonly expressed (but very rarely
practiced in life by most) sentiment – and yet he personified it, lived it.
And yet he was no fool for all that, either,
and tolerated no injustice or wrong, and had the courage – once again that
characteristic of his – to stand up to any such and say, this is wrong. And
then he would go ahead to do something about it within his capability. Not
public crusades but private immediate action on the spot was his style, as much
needed in this world of private injustices and wrongs as all the NGO’s of the
world put together. And in this he was very, very Indian, ancient Indian in
prescription, where charity is called "daan" which translates
literally as ‘gift’, and it is to be discreetly done and forgotten, not with
tax-deductible cheques to the organised religions and plaques to declare the
names.
I wish I could convey to him how much it all
meant, that I am and always have been aware of what it meant to my existence
and formation to have had his acquaintance, friendship, and more, but he knew
then, and knows even more certainly so now, now that the soul is no longer
bound by the means of communication when in body.
If this is all too eulogising, that is
probably because this is a eulogy. It is commonly said that no one is perfect
and the best, the greatest of people have qualities that are opposite to the
general great and beautiful picture, and sometimes courage in one arena does
not extend to another, even important field, nobility and generosity of one
sort does not prevent petty cowardice in another direction, and consequent
injury to someone. Public heroes are often private tyrants and cowards, and
this sort of contradiction does not negate the good that is there any more than
it makes up for the negative or lacking in the same person. And, too, a person
may change for better or worse, and those who can do progress by learning.
Those who are more conscious of an image for the public stay little in fear of
having a smallness exposed.
He was firm about some of his needs or ideas
or characteristics as most of us are and one of them was his need to stay free
of bonds, all bonds, always; unfortunately he couldn’t, so he had to tear a few
and break away from some; and if it hurt, so it was. And while it is only
natural that those of us who are more evolved wish to stay above the drudgery
and nitty-gritty of earthly existence, yet it is clear that those are the very
people whose consciousness reaching down to the earth is needed for
transformation towards greater evolutions to come. This was our basic
difference, while I understood his stance, I thought – I knew – or at least had
a glimmer of doubt, suspicion, bordering on certainty – that one ought to step
ahead of that security blanket stance and contribute a step towards that
transformation. Ironically it was a difference that normally would look the
other way to the world – does in fact to most men, for women are called weak
for being more openly able to deal with and even express concerns of emotional
or even practical sort, which is ironical.
It hurts a little that I could do so little
for him, but when I remember him, I find that it was inevitable; one can really
do very little for such a Vipaash, someone like him. He would have found any
attempt to the contrary on my part to be annoying, probably. Even when it is
probably true that no one knows him as closely or as well as I do nevertheless
we had differences of opinion and temperament and he expected to be left alone
if not followed or accompanied. When I think of it he might have been disappointed
with my not following in the way he had probably thought out, but it was not
only due to difference of temperament or nature or such natural and inevitable
needs.
My priorities had changed, and I was no longer
the sole priority of my life, in fact even my personal life, my work or career
was on hold, while someone very close and very dear was on the path to dying
and was more or less helpless – and I did not want to accept that, I wanted
recovery and completely so for her. She had endangered her very life to protect
us, and while it is expected of mothers it is a view that forgets they are
human too, they are precious just as much as anyone, they deserve a life as
well. She had then come to a point where she could rest and enjoy and had instead
been at the point of losing it, and I was desperate to turn things around.
Miraculously, I found in Pondicherry at that very moment what I needed, and was
looking for through all my existence, without being conscious even of looking
or hoping; and having found it began to expect miracles, particularly about my
mother recovering.
Some time then I wrote to Madhav and I offered
him the best I ever could and that must have been the invitation to share my
home in Pondicherry when I first went there and was happy with the house and
much, much more, finding something beyond all expectations that one has only
known as an aware soul in childhood but lost touch of since; I was inviting
everyone to share it and most people reacted differently, in their own ways.
I invited Madhav, and had certainly meant it
to be indefinite, just as he had taken care of me indefinitely with no planned
end in sight, just as I meant to bring my mother to live with me and to take
care of her and have an open house to all those who meant to visit her or live
with her. I hoped to do all this and was quite buoyant with hope.
Madhav wrote back to say yes, he had been
there, he had visited Pondicherry, on his tour of the south, long ago. Perhaps
he was as dismissive of it as he generally was of something beyond his
character, and I do not mean capability of comprehension necessarily, though
that might be a factor too. Many very intelligent people go with axiomatic
blinders within.
At any rate he wrote to say, thank you but no
thank you, giving no indication of whether he was aware of what I was so lit up
with. At a superficial level of consciousness, probably not – at a deeper level
is another story. He is one of those who belonged in Pondicherry that I had
discovered.
Perhaps now he is aware of that, and of all I
wish I had conveyed once again, perhaps he is now in that Light I then saw a
glimpse of and wished to share the thrill, the wonder, the joy, the bliss of it
with everyone. This is more than a hope or a certainty or a suspicion, it is a
prayer for him – and there is really nothing more one can wish or offer anyone,
let alone someone so great.
Only the Divine can reward someone of that
level of a person, and we the rest of us can only hope to pay it forward.
………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………
No comments:
Post a Comment