A team of scientists, perhaps only the latest one amongst many, has taken another look at the 35 miles long bridge submerged under ocean now, joining India with Sri Lanka, and pronounced it man made. There is more, about its construction. Which brought up the UPA regime attempting to declare that it wasn't the legendary bridge constructed by Raama as believed in India, that Raama never existed, thst it's all myth, etc, so that the UPA ally then in power in TN could destroy it wuth impunity and have ships go a shorter route.
If one has experienced roads in India, the story above might remind one of the umpteen drivers of all sorts of vehicles driving in a lane against the traffic direction, just so they could save a few pennies worth of fuel.
"The sand bar might be natural, but what's sitting on top of it (string of rocks) is not. There are stones that have been brought from far and set on top of the sand bar. The rocks on top of the sand actually predate the sand, so there is more to the story. The rocks are 7,000 years old." Pretty close to the estimate one heard from elders, which was 10,000 years.
Dr Subramanian Swamy is owed thanks for much by the nation for his exposing various frauds in context of UPA regime and its high command as it's referred to. This includes some frauds re questions of citizenship and education of the said high command, apart from financial scam, DNA and more.
About the bridge, the morons hell-bent on destroying it for pennies forgot the current history, namely, that the tsunami was much less devastating in coastal TN then in other parts of Asia - which might just have been because of the said bridge, stopping it from going around Sri Lanka as it did in Southern Ocean.
Responding to a comment below the original fb post about proof of existence of Raama:-
History and archaeology don't have mathematical proofs. New evidence often changes presumptions held reasonable for centuries. Moreover, India is still living mostly where her history occurred so archaeological proofs are harder (For example about Varanasi being more ancient than Jerusalem), and since Indian culture was and is cremation with ashes flown down a river, it would be hard enough to "prove" existence of any Hindu that lived before photographs existed - and those photographs can be questioned too, by simply calling them theatrical! In short, try finding a watertight proof of identities and so forth of anyone not physically present, and convincing someone who can simply point out that you are believing a myth or claim you are lying.
Anyone who thinks history was impartial during colonial era is simply adhering to the colonial subject mindset. Conquistadors always destroy the history of conquered and rewrite it, pretty much like a rapist either murdering or defaming (or threatening, in case of boys) his victims -and most get away with it.
See Spotlight, Primal Fear, et al.
Church was getting away with it, and still is. So did the colonial masters and settlers from Europe and other regions, in the old and in the new world both.
No comments:
Post a Comment